The court notes that there are two ways to show standing when one alleges violation of the First Amendment.
The first: plaintiffs may show that they intend “to engage in a course of conduct arguably affected with a constitutional interest, but proscribed by a statute, and there exists a credible threat of prosecution thereunder.”
The concrete and particulized harm is the denial of a constitutional right, and the credible threat satisfies the imminent-not-hypothetical requirement.